Fwd: Boeing CST-100 and ULA Atlas-V Crew Access Tower Taking Shape at Cape Canaveral Launch Site

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: June 30, 2015 at 9:23:48 PM CDT
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: Boeing CST-100 and ULA Atlas-V Crew Access Tower Taking Shape at Cape Canaveral Launch Site

 

 

SpaceX Rocket Explosion Shouldn't Affect Commercial Crew Plans, NASA Says

by Mike Wall, Space.com Senior Writer   |   June 29, 2015 07:30am ET

 

SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket exploded about 2 minutes after launching the company's robotic Dragon capsule on a cargo mission to the International Space Station for NASA on June 28, 2015. Credit: Robert Pearlman/collectSPACE.com View full size image

The failure of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket during a cargo launch Sunday shouldn't have a big impact on the company's ability to fly astronauts to orbit and back a few years from now, NASA officials said.

The two-stage Falcon 9 exploded Sunday (June 28) shortly after launching SpaceX's unmanned Dragon capsule on an attempted cargo mission to the International Space Station for NASA. The cause of the accident remains unclear at the moment, though SpaceX representatives have said they suspect some sort of issue with the rocket's second stage.

The Falcon 9 and Dragon aren't just a cargo-launching duo; SpaceX will also use the rocket and a modified version of the capsule to ferry astronauts to and from the orbiting lab for NASA, under a $2.6 billion deal that was announced in September. [See photos from the failed SpaceX launch]

NASA also awarded Boeing $4.2 billion to complete work on its CST-100 crew capsule. The space agency wants one or both companies to be flying astronauts to and from the orbiting lab by the end of 2017. (Since the space shuttle program ended in July 2011, NASA has been solely dependent on Russia's Soyuz capsule to provide this taxi service, at a cost of around $70 million per seat.)

That timeline is still achievable for SpaceX despite Sunday's mishap, said Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA's associate administrator for human exploration and operations.

"We can actually learn from this failure — understand a weakness or a flaw in the design that we might not have seen for a while, and so this could actually lower some of the speculation about how we want to move forward and how we want to work on the crew design," Gerstenmaier said in a press briefing Sunday.

"At this point, I don't anticipate it impacting the schedule," he added. "In fact, it could help us to nail down designs and move forward."

SpaceX president and chief operating officer Gwynne Shotwell voiced similar sentiments.

"This is a tough business. Any launch provider has to have considered this in their operational plans going forward," Shotwell said in Sunday's briefing. "So I don't anticipate this to impact any program that we have ongoing. We must find this cause of the failure, we must fix it and obviously we're going to get back to flight."

But funding issues could cause some slippage from that December 2017 target date, Gerstenmaier said. The White House asked for $1.2 billion for NASA's commercial crew program in its 2016 federal budget request, but Congress thus far seems willing to appropriate only $900 million to $1 billion.

"We really need full funding for crew," Gerstenmaier said. "We really need to keep moving forward technically, and to do that, we need the funding level we requested."

SpaceX holds a $1.6 billion NASA contract to fly at least 12 unmanned resupply missions to the space station. Sunday's launch kicked off mission number seven; the previous six had all been fully successful.

Sunday's mishap was the third cargo-mission failure in the last eight months. In October, spaceflight company Orbital ATK (which signed its own $1.9 billion resupply deal with NASA) lost its Cygnus freighter just seconds after liftoff when Orbital's Antares rocket exploded. And Russia's robotic Progress 59 spacecraft fell back to Earth in May without reaching the space station, victimized by an apparent problem with the third stage of the Soyuz rocket that launched it.

 

Copyright © 2015 TechMediaNetwork.com All rights reserved. 

 

---

 

AmericaSpace

For a nation that explores
June 29th, 2015

Boeing CST-100 and ULA Atlas-V Crew Access Tower Taking Shape at Cape Canaveral Launch Site

By Mike Killian

The first crew access tower tiers begin to take shape at Space Launch Complex-41 for flights aboard the Boeing CST-100. Credits: NASA/Cory Huston

In 2017 the United States will once again see the return of American human spaceflight to our own shores, courtesy of SpaceX and Boeing and their Dragon and CST-100 crew capsules. Boeing however is NASA's primary crew contract winner, receiving a much larger piece of the multi-billion dollar pie to fly astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS) aboard their CST-100 capsule ($4.2 billion for Boeing and $2.6 billion for SpaceX).

With two years left before an expected inaugural launch there is still a lot of work to be done, but one visible sign of progress at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station is the new Boeing/ULA (United Launch Alliance) crew access tower now being built just down the road from ULA's Atlas Space Launch Complex-41 (SLC-41), which is where Boeing's flights will take place from atop the proven ULA Atlas-V rocket.

Artist's concept of Boeing's CST-100 space taxi atop a man rated ULA Atlas-V rocket showing new crew access tower and arm at Space Launch Complex 41, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Fla. Credit: ULA

The entire tower will be erected over six to seven weeks this summer, rising like an erector set, and it's the first of its kind intended for a vehicle that will carry humans into space from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station since the one built at Launch Complex 34 for the Apollo missions in the 1960's. The fixed service structures used for crew access for NASA's 30-years of space shuttle launches from Launch Complex 39A and 39B were built in the late 1970's at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), which neighbors the Cape at the north side of Merritt Island.

When finished the new SLC-41 Atlas-V commercial crew tower will rise over 200 feet tall, some 20 stories, and the first segments are already rising above the Cape's flat landscape.

"Safety of our NASA astronauts and ground crews is at the forefront as we construct the crew access tower," said Mike Burghardt, the launch segment director for Boeing's Commercial Crew Program. "This is an exciting time in space. The crew tower embodies the fact that very soon we'll be launching crew missions again from the Space Coast."

The tower will be comprised of seven major tier segments, or levels, and each will measure about 20-foot square and 28-feet tall. Building them away from the pad allows ULA to maintain their busy Atlas launch manifest, which will launch again as soon as July 15, and also allows for foundation work for the tower at SLC-41 to move forward at the same time the tower itself is being built. Cranes move the largest pieces into place, while welders and riveters connect the thick steel beams together to form the central spars of the tower.

"The first truss segment will be transported out to the pad and installed in the July time frame," said Howard Biegler, ULA's man in charge of the company's Human Launch Services division, in comments to AmericaSpace several months ago. "That will be an above ground segment. The rest happens quick over the course of a six or seven week period. So the remaining pieces of the tower goes up rather quickly."

Each tier segment will be moved to the launch complex one by one, then will be stacked, and Biegler expects the major bulk of that work to be complete by the end of summer.

Foundation work at the pad to support the tower began last January. The site has already been excavated, and ten 42-inch-diameter piers have already been drilled and poured. The old Mobile Service Tower (MST) railroad tracks from the Titan Centaur days is being removed as well, then the dowels will be installed to secure the crew access tower.

Once the seven tiers are built and outfitted with everything (except wire harnesses and elevator rails) they will be trucked over to SLC-41 and stacked between launches. The tower will then be outfitted with all the wiring, lines, support facilities, stairs and elevators the astronaut crew and ground support staff will require. A set of slidewire baskets will be ready to help anyone on the tower to evacuate in a hurry in the unlikely event of an emergency as well.

"After the tower buildup comes the extensive work to outfit the tower with over 400 pieces of outboard steel that have to be installed," added Biegler. "That takes much longer, and will be done in parallel with the arm buildup. The completely integrated and tested crew access arm and walkway should be brought out to the launch site around May 2016, with all the site construction, testing and certifications done by September 2016."

VIDEO: Boeing/ULA Crew Access Tower Takes Shape

It should be noted that, although there won't be any crewed flights in 2016 anymore, ULA designed their game plan from day one to support a December 2016 launch (as was NASA's intention a couple years ago). They have never slipped off of their September 2016 completion date.

"This is an extremely exciting time," said Rick Marlette, deputy project manager for ULA's launch pad construction." "It's great to be doing the construction after so many years and we're bringing Atlas back to its heritage from the Mercury Program of flying astronauts into space."

In the meantime, at ULA's 1.6 million square foot Decatur, Ala. facility, the company has already started work building the two Atlas-V rockets that will launch Boeing's CST-100 space capsule on its first uncrewed and crewed test flight, both scheduled for 2017. Both rockets, each designated as AV-073 and AV-080, will be the first to be certified by both NASA and ULA to fly people to and from the International Space Station.

We continue to reach out to SpaceX regarding progress at nearby KSC LC-39A, but the company will not release any details except through Elon's Twitter account. Boeing and ULA, however, speak with us about their Commercial Crew Program progress, even inviting us to their operational facilities on occasion for progress updates.

 

Copyright © 2015 AmericaSpace - All Rights Reserved

 

---

 

Fwd: US spacewalk may be postponed due to Falcon rocket crash

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: June 30, 2015 at 9:30:34 PM CDT
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: US spacewalk may be postponed due to Falcon rocket crash

 

US spacewalk may be postponed due to Falcon rocket crash — source

MOSCOW, June 29. /TASS/. The August spacewalk under the US programme at the International Space Station (ISS) may be postponed due to the recent crash of the Falcon 9 carrier rocket, a source in the rocket and space industry told TASS on Monday.

"The spacewalk under the American programme was scheduled for August 17. However, due to the Falcon crash it may be postponed, because the Dragon cargo spacecraft was to deliver to the ISS the equipment needed for the spacewalk," the source said.

The Falcon 9 rocket with the Drago cargo spacecraft was blasted off from the US Cape Canaveral spaceport in Florida at 10:21pm (17:21pm, Moscow time) on Sunday. It exploded in 2.5 minutes after the launch. The spacecraft was to deliver to the ISS about 2 tonnes of cargoes, including food, equipment and materials for experiments and return to Earth in several weeks.

NASA administrator Charles Bolden said in a statement: "We are disappointed in the loss of the latest SpaceX cargo resupply mission to the International Space Station. However, the astronauts are safe aboard the station and have sufficient supplies for the next several months. We will work closely with SpaceX to understand what happened, fix the problem and return to flight."

The current ISS mission crew comprises Russian cosmonauts Gennady Padalka and Mikhail Korniyenko, as well as NASA astronaut Scott Kelly. Russian cosmonaut Oleg Kononenko, NASA astronaut Kjell Lindgren and Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui are planned to join them in a moth. Kelly and Lindgren were to perform the spacewalk scheduled for August.

© 2015 TASS

 

---

 

USA launch vehicle redundancy

 

Very interesting article in today's Wall Street Journal written by Willie.  J. Webb

 

 

By 

William Shelton 

June 29, 2015 7:07 p.m. ET 

The explosion of an unmanned SpaceX rocket after liftoff at Cape Canaveral in Florida on Sunday was a graphic reminder of why U.S. national space policy requires that there be two independent means of launching satellites for national-security missions: in case one launch system fails. 

SpaceX, headed by Elon Musk, is contracted to resupply the International Space Station. Critics who are unhappy about the use of Russian rocket engines for national-security launches have campaigned to get SpaceX involved in those missions. But the failure of its Falcon 9 version 1.1 rocket should give everyone pause about jettisoning a dependable arrangement vital to U.S. security. 

Current U.S. space policy is implemented by buying both the Atlas V and Delta IV rockets from the United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Lockheed Martin and Boeing. BA 0.46 % Both rockets have a 100% success record—83 launches without failure.

Yet Congress is on the verge of passing legislation—the fiscal 2016 National Defense Authorization Act—that will put U.S. space policy at considerable risk.

The problem arose last year from attacks on United Launch Alliance as a monopoly and for using Russian-made engines on its rockets. These criticisms ignore why the two companies, with the government's blessing, formed a joint venture in 2005. There was simply not enough business to sustain two domestic launch companies. 

Today the Atlas V lofts two-thirds of all national-security satellites. The first stage of the rocket is powered by the Russian-produced RD-180 engine. The U.S. government encouraged Lockheed Martin to use this engine primarily because of its performance and relatively low cost. There was also a desire to keep Russian rocket scientists at work for us, and not on projects for other countries perhaps less friendly to the U.S. 

Still, the U.S. Air Force does seek to lower launch costs, and an important part of its plan is to get new entrants into the rocket business. Today several companies are attempting to do just that. But before any new company can compete for national-security launch contracts, it must pass a rigorous certification process to ensure its rocket or rockets are reliable.

SpaceX is the first company to complete the certification process for its Falcon 9 Version 1.1 rocket—the one that failed on Sunday. But the company is also developing a "Full Thrust" Falcon 9—capable of carrying all but the heaviest satellites—and that is the rocket it intends to use to bid on national-security contracts. 

The Falcon 9 Full Thrust version hasn't gone through certification, indeed it has never been launched. Nevertheless, SpaceX lobbyists last year convinced key congressional leaders that their rocket is ready to launch national-security missions. The company's criticism of United Launch Alliance and its Russian-produced RD-180 engines—including a widely publicized antitrust lawsuit it filed in April 2014 (then withdrawn in January)—played very well on Capitol Hill and in public opinion.

As a result, the fiscal 2015 National Defense Authorization Act, which became law last December, banned using the Russian-made RD-180 beyond the remaining few engines already under contract. The purported rationale is to uphold Russian sanctions and avoid rewarding the country's bad behavior in Ukraine and elsewhere. 

Fair enough: It is smart policy to seek an alternative to a supplier based in a more bellicose Russia. But an abrupt ban is not smart. The Air Force has a more cautious transition plan—which would not curtail the RD-180 until there are two certified alternatives—but congressional action is causing that plan to unravel. 

The December legislation also mandated that a new American rocket engine be ready by 2019. United Launch Alliance has announced that it will develop a new engine, and a new rocket, to replace the Atlas V, and will do so on time. Many experts are dubious about this timetable. Yet even if United Launch Alliance can meet the deadline, it will run out of RD-180 engines well before its new rocket is ready. United Launch Alliance has also announced that it will stop production of its far more expensive Delta IV (with the exception of a variant that can lift the heaviest U.S. satellites). 

Therein lies the risk. Once United Launch Alliance runs out of RD-180 engines and Delta IV production stops, the only available rocket for most payloads will be SpaceX's uncertified Falcon 9 Full Thrust. The long-standing national space policy to ensure two means of access to space for national security satellites will be ended, essentially by congressional fiat. 

As a boss taught me long ago, the first rule of wing walking is to never let go until you have a firm grasp on the next handhold. Yet our pique at Russia, coupled with effective lobbying, has resulted in legislation that is tantamount to letting go. 

In April the House of Representatives passed a new, slightly revised fiscal 2016 National Defense Authorization Act. It contains a clause that allows the secretary of defense to waive the ban on the RD-180 for as long as needed if the secretary deems it in the national interest to do so. The Senate's version, passed on June 18, limits the waiver to a maximum of nine engines, thereby ensuring the elimination of the Atlas V from competition. 

The House and Senate bills will be reconciled in the near future. It is up to the senior leadership of the Armed Services Committees and a conference committee to protect U.S. national security by ensuring that we always have more than one reliable rocket to launch all of our military satellites. 

Gen. Shelton, who is retired from the U.S. Air Force, was the commander of Air Force Space Command from January 2011 to August 2014.

Sent from my iPad

More False Memories About the Origin (and Cost) of SLS - NASA Watch

Facts on nasaproblems.com
http://nasawatch.com/archives/2015/06/more-false-memo.html


Sent from my iPad

Should be conducting operations in Earth Orbit AND in Moon bases. FEAR of CHINA!!

So here we are, can't get cargo to ISS, no manned capabilities, have to use Russian engines for some of our critical launches. Have a administrator who flew shuttle 3 times, but will not support lifting body/ runway lander, & will not EVEN fund our inferior capsule approach which will not be successfully manned for another decade, if we are lucky!
As Jeffs of RI stated, will take FEAR of China to get our capabilities back-----
HOPE IT IS NOT TOO LATE!!!!

Sent from my iPad

SpaceX rocket failure raises questions about space station's vital supplies - Orlando Sentinel

Remember what Kraft, Krantz, Abbey said about keeping shuttle until replacement available!! IDIOTS IN DC!
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/la-fi-spacex-fallout-20150629-story.html


Sent from my iPad

Do you really think we will be a leading space faring Nation with the " on the cheap" commercial approach?

Below is a summary by a friend at nasa that sums up the "space on the cheap approach".

.... unfortunately unlike any of our past programs where we still had a say on how the vehicle is to be built plus a degree of oversight, we ( nasa) are now basically cut off from these COTS vehicles. The quality of work ranges from excellent to down right horrible! Some like Boeing have vast experience, follows much the same processes that they have been using with us and even comes up with quite a bit of product (and process) innovation and improvements of their own. Others just hires people (like Draper labs) who knows what they are doing. Finally we got the ones who hires fresh out college kids, pays them low wages and promises them dreams and uses threats to build their vehicles. We get what we pay for ....

Fwd: NASA honors fallen astronauts, lost shuttles

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: June 29, 2015 at 3:19:04 PM CDT
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: NASA honors fallen astronauts, lost shuttles

 

 

 

 June 27, 2015

 

'Forever Remembered' Shares Enduring Lessons of Challenger, Columbia

A section of the fuselage recovered from space shuttle Challenger, left, and the flight deck windows recovered from space shuttle Columbia are part of a new, permanent memorial, "Forever Remembered," opening June 27 in the Space Shuttle Atlantis exhibit at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex in Florida.

Credits: NASA/Kim Shiflett

Artifacts representing Ronald McNair, who served as a mission specialist on space shuttle mission STS-51L, are displayed in a new, permanent memorial, "Forever Remembered," in the Space Shuttle Atlantis exhibit at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex in Florida.

Credits: NASA/Kim Shiflett

Ilan Ramon, payload specialist on space shuttle mission STS-107, is remembered through artifacts and personal items in the new "Forever Remembered" memorial.

Credits: NASA/Kim Shiflett

By Anna Heiney
NASA's Kennedy Space Center, Florida

The Space Shuttle Program story is full of spectacular successes. From its maiden voyage in 1981 to its final touchdown in 2011, the capable, reusable delta-winged vehicle captivated a generation. Teams of astronauts pulled off seemingly impossible feats in Earth orbit while a cast of thousands supported them from the ground.

But the shuttle story also includes the losses of 14 courageous astronauts and the nation's first two shuttles, Columbia and Challenger. The tragedies galvanized the agency to learn from these painful events, not only to safely return the shuttle fleet to flight, but to help assure the safety of future explorers.

NASA and the astronauts' families have collaborated to create a new, permanent memorial designed to honor the crews, pay tribute to the spacecraft and emphasize the importance of learning from the past. "Forever Remembered" opened today at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex in Florida, where it completes NASA's 30-year Space Shuttle Program told throughout the Space Shuttle Atlantis exhibit.

Encompassing nearly 2,000 square feet, the memorial contains the largest collection of personal items of both flight crews. It also includes recovered hardware from both Challenger and Columbia, never before on display for viewing by the public.

Family members were present at a small ceremony Saturday as the memorial was formally opened by NASA Administrator Charles Bolden and Kennedy Space Center Director Bob Cabana, both veteran shuttle astronauts.

"The crews of Challenger and Columbia are forever a part of a story that is ongoing," Bolden said. "It is the story of humankind's evolving journey into space, the unknown, and the outer-reaches of knowledge, discovery and possibility. It is a story of hope."

Temperatures at Kennedy Space Center were just a few degrees above freezing on the morning of Jan. 28, 1986, as Challenger lifted off on its 10th mission, STS-51L. One minute and 13 seconds into the flight, a booster failure caused an explosion that destroyed the vehicle, resulting in the loss of the crew of seven astronauts: Commander Francis Scobee, Pilot Michael Smith, Mission Specialists Judith Resnik, Ellison Onizuka and Ronald McNair, and Payload Specialists Gregory Jarvis and Christa McAuliffe, a New Hampshire schoolteacher.

Seventeen years later, on Jan. 16, 2003, NASA's flagship orbiter Columbia thundered into orbit on STS-107, a 16-day science mission. On board were Commander Rick Husband, Pilot Willie McCool, Payload Commander Michael Anderson, Mission Specialists Kalpana Chawla, David Brown and Laurel Clark, and Payload Specialist Ilan Ramon, Israel's first astronaut. On Feb. 1, 2003, the orbiter broke apart in the skies above east Texas as it re-entered Earth's atmosphere on the way to a planned landing at Kennedy. Seven more lives were lost.

"I believe that it's important to share this story with everyone, and not just push it aside, or try to hide it," Cabana said. "These crews and these vehicles are part of who we are as an agency, and a nation. They tell the story of our never ending quest to explore, and our undying spirit to never give up."

"Forever Remembered" is designed to be an emotional experience, according to NASA's Mike Ciannilli, who has been NASA's lead on the memorial project since it began about four years ago. At the time, Ciannilli was a NASA Test Director and Landing Recovery Director.

"Emotion is timeless," Ciannilli explained. "It's important that we don't lock this experience into a certain time, a certain place."

"I knew it would be very emotional to see, but honestly, I didn't expect to be so impacted by it. I just can't stop thinking about it. As you walk in, you know you're in a special place," Evelyn Husband Thompson said of the memorial. Her husband, Rick, commanded Columbia on STS-107.

Visitors enter the memorial through a doorway flanked by the STS-51L and STS-107 mission patches. The orbiter and crew are remembered through individual collections lining the walls: Challenger on the left, Columbia on the right. The items were carefully chosen to share each astronaut's passions, talents and achievements, allowing their personalities to shine through.

Husband's cowboy boots and Bible. A small aircraft Smith hand-carved for his wife. Anderson's vintage Star Trek lunch box. A research paper authored by Judy Resnik, displayed alongside sheet music for violin and piano. There are flight jackets, family photographs and numerous other artifacts offering a glimpse into the people behind the names on the mission patches. Many items were loaned by the families; others belong to NASA.

"The families have been unbelievably gracious, inspiring, warm and giving," Ciannilli said. "There were times they provided comfort to me as I worked on this, and still do."

At the end of the first hall, the warmth of the astronauts' collections gives way to a small gallery where guests will see firsthand the toll these events took on the shuttle hardware. A section of Challenger's fuselage displaying the American flag stands at left; on the right, the flight deck windows of Columbia are placed at eye level.

"When I look into those windows, I see John Young and Bob Crippen preparing to launch on the boldest test flight in history, the first flight of America's space shuttle, Columbia," Cabana said.

"I see a much younger Bob Cabana launching to space on his first command, and I see Rick and Willie and the rest of the 107 crew smiling and experiencing the wonders of space on the final flight of Columbia."

While great care has been taken to preserve the pieces, they're real, bearing the scars of the trauma each shuttle endured.

"It's a beautiful remembrance of all the shuttles, with the marvelous display of Atlantis. Nothing compares to it in the world," said June Scobee Rodgers, whose husband, Dick Scobee, commanded Challenger on STS-51L. "But Challenger and Columbia are not forgotten, and they're well represented."

But that is not where the story ends.

"Forever Remembered" concludes with a focus on the recovery and return-to-flight efforts, including the emotional toll these events had on the nation, the challenges involved in recovery, and the triumph of return to flight. A looping video shares heartfelt letters written by children as they shared their condolences and messages of hope.

After each loss, investigators spent months looking at recovered hardware, poring over data and conducting analysis to determine what had gone wrong. A second video reveals rarely seen photos and footage of this painstaking process.

The space shuttle team pulled together to fix the problems and return the program to flight each time. Any less effort would not have honored the fallen astronauts or their missions. Shuttle Atlantis, on display nearby, flew the final mission of the Space Shuttle Program, STS-135.

That determined spirit is alive in every launch. In a sense, every flight is a return to flight -- another opportunity to build upon success and experience.

"The artifacts here on display are not easy to look at. Many of them are on display for the very first time," Bolden said. "It is our hope that by making them available for the public to view, we will help remind the world, that every launch, every discovery, every measure of progress, is possible only because of the sacrifice of those we have lost."

Among McAuliffe's artifacts is a quote: "I touch the future. I teach."

The lessons of Challenger and Columbia will endure as we continue to reach for the stars.

Last Updated: June 27, 2015

Editor: Anna Heiney

---

 

 

 

By William Harwood
CBS News
June 27, 2015, 10:53 AM

NASA honors fallen astronauts, lost shuttles

A section of the shuttle Challenger's fuselage is on display at a memorial honoring the crews of Challenger and Columbia at the Kennedy Space Center.

William Harwood/CBS News

 

 

In the first memorial of its kind, NASA and the families of the 14 men and women who lost their lives aboard the shuttle Challenger in 1986 and Columbia in 2003 have joined together to remember the astronauts with pictures, personal mementos and, in an emotional first, iconic wreckage from both orbiters.

The "Forever Remembered" memorial at the Kennedy Space Center's commercially operated Visitor Complex opened to the public Saturday after private viewings Thursday and Friday by family members.

"The crews of Challenger and Columbia are forever a part of a story that is ongoing," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a statement. "It is the story of humankind's evolving journey into space, the unknown, and the outer-reaches of knowledge, discovery and possibility. It is a story of hope."

In the shadow of the shuttle Atlantis, mounted as if in flight in an open split-level building, the new memorial strives to strike a balance between sober reflection and a celebration of the crew members' lives and the vehicles that carried them aloft.

Challenger's crew -- commander Francis "Dick" Scobee, pilot Michael Smith, Ellison Onizuka, Judith Resnik, Ronald McNair, satellite engineer Gregory Jarvis and New Hampshire teacher Christa McAuliffe -- was killed when the shuttle broke up 73 seconds after liftoff on Jan. 28, 1986, because of a rupture in one of its solid-fuel boosters.

Columbia's crew -- commander Rick Husband, pilot William "Willie" McCool, David Brown, Kalpana Chawla, Michael Anderson, Laurel Clark and Israeli flier Ilan Ramon -- died during re-entry on Feb. 1, 2003, victims of wing damage caused by falling foam insulation during launch 16 days earlier.

The memorial features a central hallway with displays on both walls honoring each crew member, including personal items provided by their families.

The astronauts who lost their lives aboard the shuttles Challenger and Columbia are remembered at a new memorial at the Kennedy Space Center that features personal items donated by the families.

William Harwood/CBS News

Husband's Bible and Tony Lama cowboy boots can be seen, along with a house plan drawn up by Smith, a research paper written by Resnik, a "Star Trek" lunchbox and Cub Scout shirt once worn by Anderson and a charred page from Ramon's flight notebook, recovered after the accident.

Other mementos include Scobee's slide rule-like navigation computer and a leather flight helmet, Onizuka's personal Buddhist prayer beads, a biking trophy won by Jarvis and a copy of "Jonathan Livingston Seagull," one of Chawla's favorite books.

A photograph in Husband's display shows Columbia's crew, dressed in bright orange pressure suits, huddling for a group prayer before heading to the launch pad. In his Bible, the deeply religious shuttle commander had underlined Proverbs 5:6: "Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight."

"This was very important to me and very important to the people who work here at KSC," Kennedy Space Center Director Robert Cabana, a veteran shuttle commander, told CBS News during a pre-opening walkthrough Thursday. "Challenger and Columbia, they're part of our history, they're part of who we are as a nation and as an agency.

"And I think it's important to share that part of the story with everyone. It is part of who we are. It needs to be shared."

Columbia commander Rick Husband's Bible, cowboy boots and scout shirt were donated to a new Kennedy Space Center memorial honoring the astronauts who perished in the Challenger and Columbia disasters.

NASA

At the end of the hall, a quote from President Ronald Reagan hangs on the wall: "The future doesn't belong to the fainthearted, it belongs to the brave."

Turning to the right, visitors enter a larger, darker room. On one wall, in a starkly lit display, is a large section of the torn, heavily damaged outer skin of Challenger's fuselage, still showing the American flag and an open vent door.

The recovered debris of Challenger has been stored for nearly three decades in two abandoned Minuteman missile silos at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. The wreckage shown at the memorial is the first debris from Challenger to be publicly displayed since the accident investigation was concluded in 1986.

Columbia is represented by the orbiter's six forward cockpit window frames, arranged as they were when still part of the orbiter. The glass is gone, of course, and the frames are discolored and clearly damaged. But they retain their iconic shapes and are instantly recognizable.

"They say the eyes are the windows to the soul," Cabana said, choking back tears. "And I think that's true of Columbia also. They're the windows to the soul of Columbia. And when I look at that, I see (astronauts) John Young and Bob Crippen on the first flight of Columbia. I see a young Bob Cabana on his first command. And I see Rick and Willie and the whole 107 crew, with smiles on their faces, enjoying that space flight."

For many workers at the Florida spaceport, NASA's shuttles -- Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis and Endeavour -- were engineering marvels at the pinnacle of human achievement, each with its own "personality." And many space workers have voiced frustration over the years that the public never fully appreciated what an achievement the orbiters represented.

While the three surviving shuttles can be visited in museums, Cabana said adding wreckage from Challenger and Columbia brings closure, of a sort, to the thousands of men and women who maintained, serviced and launched NASA's fleet of space shuttles.

"The exhibit, it's not just a memorial to the crews, it is a memorial to the vehicles, to the entire KSC team," Cabana said. "The crews were part of our family, and the vehicles, they're part of our family, too."

The shuttle Columbia's crew, floating together for a group portrait aboard the orbiter, in a photo recovered after the accident. Left to right (blue shirts): David Brown, William McCool and Michael Anderson. Left to right (red shirts): Kalpana Chawla, commander Rick Husband, Laurel Clark and Ilan Ramon. The image is shown as part of a multi-media display in a new memorial honoring the crews of Columbia and Challenger.

NASA

A final room in the memorial features three multi-screen high-definition video displays. One shows samples of cards and letters sent to NASA in the wake of the accidents. One child wrote: "I know being an astronaut is dangerous. But they were brave enough to follow their dreams."

A second display chronicles NASA's recovery from the two disasters, including the collection and analysis of debris. The third display highlights the "return to flight" missions that followed Challenger and Columbia after lengthy investigations.

More than a million tourists visit the KSC Visitor Complex each year, and Cabana said he hopes the shuttle memorial, along with the Atlantis display and other historical artifacts, will give the public a better appreciation of NASA's winged orbiters and the 14 men and women who lost their lives on the high frontier.

"It's our history. It's about perseverance. It's about rising above adversity," Cabana said. "It's about the vehicles, the crews and the NASA family that made it all possible. We're not going to forget the lessons that we learned. We're not going to forget the crews or the people who made it possible. ... This is an important part of that story that needs to be shared."

© 2015 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.                      

 

---

 

Fwd: 20 Years Since the First Shuttle-Mir Docking Mission

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: June 29, 2015 at 10:13:54 AM CDT
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: 20 Years Since the First Shuttle-Mir Docking Mission

 

AmericaSpace

For a nation that explores
June 27th, 2015

'To Work Co-operatively': 20 Years Since the First Shuttle-Mir Docking Mission (Part 3)

By Ben Evans

Russia's space station Mir, as pictured by the crew of STS-71. Photo Credit: NASA

Twenty years ago, today, on 27 June 1995, a new era began. Space Shuttle Atlantis rocketed into orbit from the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida, as she had done 13 times previously, over the course of almost a full decade. Since her maiden voyage, she had embarked on a chequered career, flying more classified Department of Defense assignments than any of her sister orbiters, delivering both the Magellan and Galileo planetary spacecraft on their long voyages to Venus and Jupiter, supporting multiple Extravehicular Activities (EVAs), and deploying more than a dozen discrete satellites for science, reconnaissance, intelligence-gathering, and communications. Yet on 27 June 1995, Atlantis' mission was quite different, for STS-71 would attempt a feat for which the shuttle had always been intended: the docking and exchange of crew members aboard an Earth-circling space station. What could hardly have been anticipated, just a few years earlier, however, was that she would dock not at the U.S.-led Space Station Freedom … but at Russia's Mir orbital outpost. The remarkable 10 days of STS-71 would cement an unlikely partnership which, despite political differences, endures to this day.

As described in last week's AmericaSpace history articles, Atlantis was very much in the right place at the right time to become the first shuttle to be outfitted with the Orbiter Docking System (ODS) and associated instrumentation for missions to Mir. In the summer of 1992, shortly before her STS-46 mission, she was preparing to be withdrawn from service for a protracted period of maintenance and refurbishment at Rockwell International's facility in Palmdale, Calif. According to NASA's January 1992 shuttle manifest, Atlantis was expected to be out of service for a few months, receiving her modifications at KSC, ahead of flying the STS-57 mission. However, by late June 1992—following the first U.S.-Russian shuttle-Mir agreements, signed between NASA Administrator Dan Goldin and Director-General of the Russian Space Agency Yuri Koptev—it was announced that Atlantis would undergo her modifications in Palmdale, thus allowing the KSC workforce to concentrate on processing her sister orbiters for their missions. The shuttle-Mir enhancements required a more protracted out-of-service period for Atlantis, and she finally returned to flight on STS-66 in November 1994.

By pure happenstance, Atlantis happened to be about to enter a protracted period of modification when the shuttle-Mir contracts were signed in 1992. As a result, she was the primary orbiter outfitted for the docking missions. Photo Credit: NASA

Seven months later, on 29 June 1995, two days in her STS-71 mission, Atlantis docked smoothly with the Kristall module of Russia's Mir space station, to applause from both the U.S. and Russian Mission Control Centers (MCC). Aboard the shuttle were seven spacefarers—a "core" NASA crew of Commander Robert "Hoot" Gibson, Pilot Charlie Precourt, and Mission Specialists Ellen Baker, Greg Harbaugh, and Bonnie Dunbar, together with Russian cosmonauts Anatoli Solovyov and Nikolai Budarin, who were about to begin a multi-month stay on Mir—whilst on the other side of Kristall's hatch, inside the station itself, was a joint U.S.-Russian team of three men. Launched in March 1995, the incumbent Mir crew consisted of Commander Vladimir Dezhurov, his Russian crewmate Gennadi Strekalov, and U.S. astronaut Norm Thagard, the latter of whom had recently set a record for the longest single space mission ever undertaken by an American citizen. On 9 June, Thagard surpassed the 84-day accomplishment of the final Skylab crew, and by the time he returned to Earth aboard STS-71 he would have spent 115 days aloft on a single flight, and, when combined with his four earlier shuttle missions, would secure a new cumulative record for U.S. space experience of 140 days in orbit.

However, immediately after docking, everyone's attention was upon other matters, as pressurization and leak checks were conducted between Atlantis and Mir. In his NASA oral history, Precourt remembered floating into the ODS and spotting Dezhurov, Strekalov, and Thagard through the porthole. "The hatch is already open and we're doing pressure checks with our hatch," he recalled, "and our hatch opens last, to physically give us access, so you can look through this little porthole and wave to the guys on the other side and you can see that they're really antsy for us to open our hatch." In the aftermath of the leak checks, the hatch was finally opened and in a highly symbolic gesture—and offering a tip of the hat to the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (ASTP), two decades earlier—the commanders of Atlantis and Mir, Gibson, and Dezhurov shook hands and exchanged smiles and greetings at the interface between the ODS and Kristall.

Precourt's first glimpse of Norm Thagard in the flesh was a comical one. "Norm," the newcomes shouted, "you guys are upside down!"

"Naw," retorted Thagard, by now accustomed to microgravity, after more than three months in free-fall. "You guys are upside down!"

After all seven STS-71 crew members had boarded Mir, the 10-strong group assembled for a televised welcoming ceremony. On that same day, 29 June 1995, their respective responsibilities shifted. After moving their personal gear and specially molded seat liners over to the Soyuz TM-21 spacecraft—which had been docked at Mir since March—Solovyov and Budarin immediately became the 19th long-duration crew of the aging station. Meanwhile, Dezhurov, Strekalov, and Thagard moved directly over to the shuttle and became STS-71 crew members for their eventual return to Earth.

For the next five days, more than twice as long as the joint operations had lasted on ASTP, the Atlantis-Mir combo circled Earth in a tight, mechanized embrace. During that period, medical samples from Thagard's research, including disks and cassettes, over 100 urine and saliva samples, 30 blood samples, 20 surface samples, 12 air samples, numerous water samples, and even breath samples were transferred to the shuttle. A broken computer from Mir was also removed, and about 990 pounds (450 kg) of water, generated by Atlantis for waste system flushing and electrolysis, was loaded into Russian tanks and moved over to the station for use by Solovyov and Budarin. Additionally, EVA tools for the repair of a solar array on Mir's Spektr module were transferred and oxygen and nitrogen from Atlantis' environmental control system were used to raise air pressure on the station to improve its consumables margins.

Mir Commander Vladimir Dezhurov (left) and STS-71 Commander Robert "Hoot" Gibson shake hands after hatch opening on 29 June 1995. Photo Credit: NASA

In the rear of the shuttle's payload bay, connected to the middeck and ODS by means of a pressurized tunnel, was the Spacelab module, flying for the first—and only—occasion aboard Atlantis. It was utilized for 15 shuttle-Mir research experiments on Dezhurov, Strekalov, and Thagard, with the studies led by Baker. These included six metabolic investigation, focusing on a range of physiological responses in the long-duration crew members' bodies, in order to ascertain how fluids redistributed themselves during extended spaceflights. The three men participated in efforts to understand whether prolonged microgravity exposure might impair their ability to mount an antibody response and if their immune cells had been altered in any way. Other experiments employed Russian and U.S. Lower Body Negative Pressure (LBNP) apparatus to assess their usefulness as countermeasures to the kind of "orthostatic intolerance" frequently reported by astronauts and cosmonauts upon their return to terrestrial gravity conditions.

As part of this research, Dezhurov, Strekalov, and Thagard would return to Earth in a reclining position, aboard custom-molded recumbent seats in Atlantis' middeck, with changes in their heart rates, blood pressure, voices, and posture continuously monitored through re-entry and landing. As part of ongoing neurosensory investigations, the crew measured muscle tone, strength, and endurance by electromyography, and utilization of oxygen during 1-2 hours of daily walking or running on a treadmill, together with other exercise sessions. Microbial samples were taken from both Mir and the shuttle, as well as specimens from the crew themselves, in order to determine if the closed environment of a spacecraft or space station affected microbial physiology and its interaction with humans in orbit. Muscle co-ordination and mental agility were also monitored.

The Spacelab module also supported a variety of other experiments. It provided a means to return the pre-fertilised Japanese quail eggs to Earth, following their launch aboard a Progress resupply craft in April 1995, and to deliver new sensors to Mir for the station's on-board greenhouse. A series of several hundred protein crystal growth investigations, frozen in a thermos-bottle-like vacuum dewar, were delivered to Mir for the next four months; it was intended that they would be retrieved and brought back to the ground by the second shuttle-Mir crew, during STS-74 in November 1995.

The agreements signed during the course of 1992-93 enabled this remarkable sight of a U.S. space shuttle docked with the Russian Mir Space Station. East and West were brought together in human space flight endeavors for the first time in almost two decades. Photo Credit: NASA

Early on 30 June, with the Russian tricolor and U.S. flags as a backdrop in the Spacelab module, the crews exchanged gifts, including the ceremonial joining of a halved pewter medallion, which bore a relief image of the docked shuttle-Mir combination. A 1/200-scale model of the two spacecraft was also joined, with the intention that both gifts would be presented to U.S. and Russian heads of state after the mission. Furthermore, a proclamation was signed by all 10 astronauts and cosmonauts, certifying the date and time of docking, which declared that "The success of this endeavor demonstrates the desire of these two nations to work co-operatively to achieve the goal of providing tangible scientific and technical rewards that will have far-reaching effects to all people of the planet Earth."

After a brief, but intense, five days of joint activity, the time inexorably drew nearer to close the hatches and prepare for Atlantis' return to Earth. Yet even this would produce its own raft of records and accomplishments. Having launched with seven crew members, the shuttle would land—for the first time in its history—with a larger crew of eight. Moreover, STS-71 would be the first shuttle mission to return to Earth carrying different crew members from those with which it had launched. And it would be the first shuttle flight to feature as many as 10 discrete crew members.

Perhaps most significant, though, was that—unlike ASTP, two decades before—STS-71 represented just the start of nine shuttle-Mir docking missions, more than two consecutive years of U.S. long-duration presence aboard the station and, despite political, technical, and very human difficulties along the way, the cementing of a real partnership between two old foes. That partnership has weathered much turmoil, particularly in the second decade of the present century, and yet has endured as a testament to those who made it possible.

 

Copyright © 2015 AmericaSpace - All Rights Reserved

 

---

 

 

AmericaSpace

For a nation that explores
June 28th, 2015

'To Work Co-operatively': 20 Years Since the First Shuttle-Mir Docking Mission (Part 4)

By Ben Evans

Mir Commander Vladimir Dezhurov (left) and STS-71 Commander Robert "Hoot" Gibson shake hands after hatch opening on 29 June 1995. Photo Credit: NASA

Two decades have passed, this week, since one of the most remarkable instances of international co-operation ever seen in human history. For 10 days, between 27 June and 7 July 1995, six U.S. astronauts and four Russian cosmonauts—and thousands of engineers, managers, scientists, families, and friends who supported them and made their mission possible—completed the first docking between a space shuttle and the Mir orbital station. Unlike the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) in July 1975, this was not a "standalone" mission of détente, but the beginning of an era which would see two former foes join forces in support of a common goal. That goal bore fruit over the following years, with the construction of the International Space Station (ISS), and as noted in a proclamation signed by the 10-strong crew: "The success of this endeavor demonstrates the desire of these two nations to work co-operatively to achieve the goal of providing tangible scientific and technical rewards that will have far-reaching effects to all people of the Planet Earth."

In yesterday's AmericaSpace history article, the historic nature of shuttle mission STS-71 and the first docking was highlighted, as were the raft of records and empirical achievements accomplished. For the first time, the shuttle accomplished one of its original design goals—to dock with an Earth-circling space station and exchange crew members—and for the first time returned home with a different (and larger) crew than the one with which it had launched. Additionally, U.S. astronaut Norm Thagard set a new record, not only for the longest single mission ever accomplished by an American citizen (115 days), but also for the longest cumulative time spent in orbit by an American citizen (140 days), spread across his five career spaceflights. His record, to be fair, would not last long, being eclipsed by fellow astronaut Shannon Lucid in 1996, but marked the next step on the ladder as the U.S. sought to extend its long-duration experience and ultimately enabled the current One-Year Mission by Scott Kelly in 2015-2016.

Atlantis' five days docked to Mir proved largely uneventful from a systems perspective. With the exception of a General Purpose Computer (GPC) alarm on 30 June 1995—caused by the failure to synchronize with one of its siblings—only the most minor of issues troubled the shuttle during this period. The need to reset a troublesome hydrogen valve also disturbed STS-71 Commander Robert "Hoot" Gibson's sleep, and, early on 1 July, a temperature in one of the nose-mounted Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters fell briefly below its temperature redline, requiring the crew to adjust Atlantis' attitude to provide increased solar warming. "The temperature drop was not unexpected," NASA explained, "due to the inertial attitude the Atlantis/Mir spacecraft has been flying." Gibson and STS-71 Pilot Charlie Precourt also performed a thruster firing to test the integrity of the Orbiter Docking System (ODS) and found the hardware to be very secure.

The STS-71 and Mir crews gather for a group photograph inside the Spacelab module aboard Atlantis' payload bay. Photo Credit: NASA

It was already intended that Mir's new crew of Russian cosmonauts Anatoli Solovyov and Nikolai Budarin—who had arrived at the station aboard the shuttle—would board and undock the Soyuz TM-21 spacecraft from the aft longitudinal port of the Kvant-1 module about 15 minutes prior to Atlantis' own separation on 4 July, in order to capture still and video imagery from a station-keeping distance of about 330 feet (100 meters). In preparation for this task, on 2 July, they checked out their pressure suits and performed leak checks. Finally, on the afternoon of 3 July, the time came for the two crews to part and the returning STS-71 astronauts and cosmonauts gave Solovyov and Budarin gifts of flight pins, watches, fresh fruit, and tortillas.

The tortillas were Mission Specialist Bonnie Dunbar's idea. Having trained with Solovyov for a long-duration Mir expedition, she knew that he loved them; in fact, both he and Budarin enjoyed American food. There was plenty left over aboard Atlantis, so she took some tortillas—"great big, soft, Mexican tortillas"—over to him, shortly before the hatches were closed. At this point, Solovyov pulled her to him. Which side of the hatch would she like to stay on, he asked. Dunbar grinned. As much as she would have loved to remain aboard Mir for a long-duration mission, she told Solovyov that she had to return on the shuttle. Solovyov secured the hatch on the Mir side at 3:32 p.m. EDT, whilst Mission Specialist Greg Harbaugh did likewise in the ODS a few minutes at 3:48 p.m.

Fittingly, the undocking between Atlantis and Mir occurred in the early hours of U.S. Independence Day, 4 July 1995. At the same time, Solovyov and Budarin deactivated several station systems, in anticipation of their own undocking and flyaround. At 6:55 a.m. EDT, Soyuz TM-21 separated from Mir and soon reached a station-keeping position of about 330 feet (100 meters), from which Budarin acquired stunning imagery as Atlantis herself undocked at 7:09:45 a.m. The undocking procedure required Harbaugh to depressurize the ODS docking base and command the unhooking of latches, after which pre-loaded separation springs pushed the two spacecraft apart at low velocity. At a distance of a couple of feet (60 cm), after clearing the respective docking mechanisms, Gibson reactivated Atlantis' thrusters and pulsed them in a Low-Z mode to begin the relative separation. At 400 feet (120 meters), he began a steady flyaround inspection of Mir, during which time the redocking of Soyuz TM-21 was captured in still and video imagery at 7:39 a.m. The redocking occurred a minute earlier than planned when Mir's on-board computer malfunctioned and crashed. The station had been left in free drift during the brief flight, but was about 10 degrees off its correct attitude and was becoming unstable and starting to drift. Solovyov and Budarin restored the situation to normal.

From his perspective, Gibson described the maneuvers of Soyuz TM-21, Mir, and the shuttle as "a cosmic ballet." With eight crew members now aboard Atlantis, this was the joint largest crew ever carried aboard the shuttle in orbit during independent flight. Whilst the medical research continued aboard the Spacelab module, the pilots continued to maintain a steady separation distance from Mir. By the end of 5 July, they were 230 miles (370 km) "behind" the station and increasing their separation distance by about 10 miles (16 km) with each orbit, although Gibson was still able to see Mir as a far-off point of light.

With landing scheduled for early on the 7th, Mission Specialist Ellen Baker set to work assembling three recumbent seats in Atlantis' middeck for the returning Mir crew of Russian cosmonauts Vladimir Dezhurov and Gennadi Strekalov and U.S. astronaut Norm Thagard. Having the Russians aboard was a pleasant experience for the shuttle crew … and presented the opportunity for Dezhurov to prank at Precourt's expense. One day, Precourt was working with a volt ohm meter on the aft flight deck, repairing a broken circuit, when the cosmonaut floated up behind him and whispered "Pfftt" in his ear. "You can't jump in space, but you can sure go reeling in zero-gravity," Precourt told the NASA oral historian, "and I could've choked him, but he had this big grin on his face! It was just a neat experience to bring him on the shuttle, show him around and let him feel at home."

Twenty years ago, this week, the first Space Shuttle mission docked with Russia's Mir space station, laying the foundation for a new era of co-operation between two former foes. Photo Credit: NASA

In the meantime, most of the Spacelab hardware was deactivated and Gibson, Precourt, and Harbaugh prepared the shuttle's systems for re-entry. Two opportunities existed to land at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) on 7 July, the first occurring a few seconds before 10:55 a.m. EDT and the second at 12:31 p.m. In contrast to the difficulties in getting Atlantis off the ground, her return to Earth was charmed, and at 9:45 a.m. the twin Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) engines were fired for the irreversible deorbit to begin an hour-long hypersonic plunge into the "sensible" atmosphere. Seventy minutes later, at 10:54:34 a.m., Gibson executed a perfect landing on KSC's Runway 15, wrapping up a 10-day voyage and one of the most spectacular human spaceflights ever accomplished.

A normal homecoming came as a great pleasure for Dezhurov and Strekalov, for two reasons. Obviously, they were relieved that they had returned to Earth safely, but secondly they were pleased that they were not challenged by the U.S. authorities for lacking passports and visas upon landing in Florida. During their final days aboard Mir, Strekalov pulled Thagard to one side and, in all seriousness, expressed concern that he had no passport or travel visa. Would he be arrested?

"I kept trying to allay Gennadi," said Thagard in his oral history. "Of course, he comes from a different culture, but knowing what I know of bureaucracy, I should have been worried a little bit for him, but I couldn't believe that in a million years they were going to arrest Veloga or Gennadi because they arrived in the United States with no passport. I hadn't even thought about it, but Gennadi obviously had been thinking about it quite a lot."

After 115 days, eight hours, and 43 minutes in flight, Dezhurov, Strekalov, and Thagard could have been forgiven for being a little unsteady on their feet. However, Thagard was one of the first of them to unstrap and stand up after landing. His recumbent couch was on the starboard side of Atlantis' middeck, farthest from the hatch, so he had to wait until Dezhurov, Strekalov, and—in a normal, upright seat—Bonnie Dunbar had departed before he could leave the orbiter. "I walked off with no assistance," Thagard recalled. "I didn't have that much of a problem." In fact, the biggest issue was the amount of monitoring equipment, including an electrocardiograph and an irritating blood pressure cuff, which rhythmically pumped itself up every few minutes, leaving his arm bruised and little feeling in his hand.

Within an hour or two of landing, after medical tests, he no longer felt "heavy," but it took a few days for him to return to his normal self. Nevertheless, the three men were flown back to Ellington Field in Houston, Texas, aboard an Air Force C-9 Medevac aircraft for several weeks of medical tests and readaptation to normal terrestrial gravity. The remainder of the STS-71 crew returned to Houston later on 7 July. "I still didn't feel totally gainly," Thagard said later. "I felt a little awkward; more so than on my shorter shuttle flights. I had a real sensation that if I were to bend forward, if I weren't careful, I'd continue to go forward, and if I bent back, if I weren't careful, I'd continue to go back."

Walking down hallways and turning, he felt the tendency to overshoot the corner, brushing his shoulder against a wall. "You just don't turn sharply enough," he said, "and that's all because of the gains that change in the vestibular system while you're there." By his own admission, after each of his four previous shuttle flights, Thagard had felt back to normal within about 24 hours of landing; after his Mir mission, it took around five days, which still represented a remarkably rapid readaptation to gravity. On 12 July, he went jogging with Charlie Precourt and Ellen Baker. "It was the hardest three miles I ever did," he said, "but I did it."

 

Copyright © 2015 AmericaSpace - All Rights Reserved

 

---

 

Fwd: SpaceX rocket explodes after launch

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Date: June 29, 2015 at 9:30:27 AM CDT
To: "Gary Johnson" <gjohnson144@comcast.net>
Subject: FW: SpaceX rocket explodes after launch

 

 

 June 28, 2015

15-140

 

NASA Administrator Statement on the Loss of SpaceX CRS-7

The following is a statement from NASA Administrator Charles Bolden on the loss Sunday of the SpaceX Commercial Resupply Services 7 (CRS-7) mission.

"We are disappointed in the loss of the latest SpaceX cargo resupply mission to the International Space Station. However, the astronauts are safe aboard the station and have sufficient supplies for the next several months. We will work closely with SpaceX to understand what happened, fix the problem and return to flight. The commercial cargo program was designed to accommodate loss of cargo vehicles. We will continue operation of the station in a safe and effective way as we continue to use it as our test bed for preparing for longer duration missions farther into the solar system.  

"A Progress vehicle is ready to launch July 3, followed in August by a Japanese HTV flight. Orbital ATK, our other commercial cargo partner, is moving ahead with plans for its next launch later this year. 

"SpaceX has demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in its first six cargo resupply missions to the station, and we know they can replicate that success. We will work with and support SpaceX to assess what happened, understand the specifics of the failure and correct it to move forward. This is a reminder that spaceflight is an incredible challenge, but we learn from each success and each setback. Today's launch attempt will not deter us from our ambitious human spaceflight program."  

David Weaver
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1600
david.s.weaver@nasa.gov

Last Updated: June 28, 2015

Editor: Allard Beutel

 

---

 

SpaceX rocket destroyed on way to space station, cargo lost

By MARCIA DUNN

An unmanned SpaceX rocket carrying supplies to the International Space Station broke apart Sunday shortly after liftoff. It was a severe blow to NASA, the third cargo mission to fail in eight months.

The accident happened about 2½ minutes into the flight from Cape Canaveral, Florida. A billowing white cloud emerged in the sky, growing bigger and bigger, then fiery plumes shot out. Pieces of the rocket could be seen falling into the Atlantic like a fireworks display gone wrong.

More than 5,200 pounds of space station cargo were on board, including the first docking port designed for future commercial crew capsules, a new spacesuit and a water filtration system.

NASA officials said they have enough supplies for the three-person crew on board the station to last till October and still plan to send three more crewmembers up in a late July launch. Normally, NASA likes to have a six-month cushion of food and water, but is now down to four months.

"We're good from a food and water standpoint," NASA's top spaceflight official, William Gerstenmaier said at a press conference.

This puts added pressure on another resupply launch scheduled for Friday by Russia, it's first attempt since losing a supply capsule in April.

SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket shattered while traveling at 2,900 mph, about 27 miles up. Everything seemed to be going well until the rocket went supersonic.

"We appear to have had a launch vehicle failure," announced NASA commentator George Diller. Data stopped flowing from the Falcon 9 rocket around 2 minutes and 19 seconds, he said.

SpaceX founder and chief executive Elon Musk later said that the pressure got too high in the liquid-oxygen tank of the rocket's upper stage.

"That's all we can say with confidence right now," Musk said via Twitter.

The private company is in charge of the accident investigation, with oversight from the Federal Aviation Administration, which licensed the flight.

The Dragon capsule, which is designed to eventually carry people, still sent signals to the ground after the rocket broke apart, said SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell. Had astronauts been on board, a still-being tested abort system, would have whisked them away to safety in such a mishap, she said.

SpaceX hopes to launch astronauts from U.S. soil again aboard the Falcon-Dragon combination in December 2017. They still can make that target, Shotwell said. Now NASA buys seats from Russia to get astronauts to the orbiting lab.

Shotwell assured reporters that the California-based company will fix the problem — "and get back to flight."

Losing this shipment — which included replacements for items lost in the two earlier failed supply flights — was a huge setback for NASA.

"This is a blow to us," Gerstenmaier said, citing the docking port, a spacesuit and considerable scientific research that had been on board. He said there was nothing common among the three accidents, "other than it's space and it's difficult to go fly."

In April, a Russian cargo ship spun out of control and burned up upon re-entry. And last October, an Orbital Sciences Corp. capsule was destroyed in a launch accident in Virginia. Orbital Sciences and SpaceX have NASA contracts to ship cargo.

"Three failures on three different vehicles is unusual, but it would be even more worrisome if we had only one means of access," former NASA associate administrator Scott Pace wrote in an email to The Associated Press.

In addition to Friday's scheduled Russian launch, Orbital Sciences may be able to launch their supply ship at the end of this year, using another company's rocket. And a Japanese resupply ship is scheduled for August, Gerstenmaier said.

The seven previous SpaceX supply runs, dating back to 2012, had gone exceedingly well.

The three space station residents were watching the launch live from orbit, including astronaut Scott Kelly.

"Sadly failed," Kelly said via Twitter. "Space is hard."

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden and other officials stressed that the space station crew is in no immediate trouble. NASA space station program manager Mike Suffredini said the water filtration system is nearing the point where it can't function much longer, but there is still enough stored water to make it to October or so.

Gerstenmaier said the loss shouldn't postpone plans to send three more men to join the crew on July 22, a flight already delayed two months.

Along with SpaceX, Boeing is also developing crew capsules for NASA. Boeing designed the new docking system that was lost on the SpaceX flight, but a second version is still available to send up, officials said.

Shotwell said the first stage of the rocket seemed to work well. The company had planned to try to land the discarded booster on an ocean platform.

Kelly's identical twin, Mark, a former space shuttle commander who is taking part in medical studies on the ground, pointed out that SpaceX, until now, had "a great record" with its Falcon 9 rockets.

"These things happen," he said in a tweet. "They will figure this out."

Launch spectators lining the beaches near Cape Canaveral were confused, at first, by the unexpected plumes in the sky.

"It looked fine until it was almost out of sight. And then, a poof of smoke," said Whitney Jackson of Palm Beach, Florida, watching with her family. "Everyone was cheering and clapping. No one knew it meant failure."

The Air Force later warned people along the Florida coast not to handle any debris washing ashore.

Sunday was Musk's 44th birthday. The SpaceX founder also runs his electric car company, Tesla.

"Yeah, not the best birthday," Musk tweeted.

___

AP Science Writer Seth Borenstein in Washington and reporter Alex Sanz in Atlanta contributed to this report.

 

Copyright © 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. 

 

---

 

 

 

SpaceX rocket supplying space station explodes after Florida launch

By Irene Klotz 

 

.

View photo

An unmanned SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches from Cape Canaveral, Florida, June 28, 2015. The rocket exploded about two minutes after liftoff on Sunday, destroying a cargo ship bound for the International Space Station, NASA said. REUTERS/Mike Brown

 

 

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - An unmanned Space Exploration Technologies rocket exploded about two minutes after liftoff from Florida on Sunday, destroying a cargo ship bound for the International Space Station in the latest in a string of mishaps in supplying the orbiting outpost.

The 208-foot-tall (63-meter) rocket, built and flown by the company known as SpaceX that is owned by technology entrepreneur Elon Musk, had previously made 18 successful launches since its 2010 debut. Those included six cargo runs for NASA under a 15-flight contract worth more than $2 billion.

The accident soon after liftoff from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station was the second successive botched mission to resupply the space station. A Russian Progress cargo ship failed to reach the outpost in April following a problem with its Soyuz launcher. Russia plans to launch a replacement capsule on Friday.

Only SpaceX's Dragon capsules, however, return cargo and critical experiment results back from the station. The company's next supply run for NASA had been targeted for September, but the launch schedule is likely to be revised.

The explosion also marks a setback for SpaceX, which was poised to compete for the first time against United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co and the current sole launch provider for military and spy satellite launches, to launch a GPS III satellite.

Musk said on Twitter: "Falcon 9 experienced a problem shortly before first stage shutdown. Will provide more info as soon as we review the data."

A spokesman for the company had no immediate further comment.

It was not immediately clear if the rocket broke apart on its own, or if Air Force range safety officers detonated explosives on the rocket, part of a system to ensure wayward boosters do not impact populated areas, NASA said.

Air Force officials were not immediately available to comment.

The crew - two Russian cosmonauts and an American astronaut - on the International Space Station has about four months of food and supplies on board, so the accident does not pose an immediate problem for them.

However, NASA's second cargo transporter, run by Orbital ATK , remains grounded following a launch accident in October.

EQUIPMENT, FOOD, EXPERIMENTS LOST

SpaceX lost contact with the Falcon 9 about 2 minutes and 19 seconds after liftoff, NASA launch commentator George Diller said.

"It's not clear yet from the data what happened. They are beginning to play back video to look and see if there are any indications in the video what may have happened," he said.

The accident occurred just before the rocket was to discard its first stage two minutes 39 seconds after liftoff.

Despite the explosion, one SpaceX customer voiced support in the company and the Falcon 9.

"One inevitable failure for such a young system should not in any way shake anyone's faith in the rocket or the team. What's amazing is that it took this long to happen," said Mike Gold, business operations director with Nevada-based Bigelow Aerospace.

The spacecraft lost on Sunday carried 5,461 pounds (2,477 kg) of food, clothing, equipment and science experiments for the station, a $100 billion research laboratory that flies about 260 miles (420 km) above Earth.

The gear included the first of two docking systems for space taxis under development by SpaceX and Boeing to park at the station. NASA hopes to turn over crew transportation to the U.S. companies before the end of 2017, breaking Russia's monopoly.

Including its station cargo runs for NASA, SpaceX has a backlog of nearly 50 missions, worth more than $7 billion, including dozens of commercial communications satellites. The company last month won U.S. Air Force certification to fly military and national security missions on the Falcon 9.

SpaceX holds a second NASA contract, worth up to $2.6 billion, to upgrade its Dragon capsule to fly astronauts to the station. Boeing's contract is worth up $4.2 billion.

In addition to its launch pad at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, SpaceX leases one of the mothballed space shuttle launch pads at the adjacent Kennedy Space Center and is building a new launch site in Texas.

The company has also flown once from a launch pad at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

(Reporting by Irene Klotz; Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal in Washington; Editing by Eric Beech and Frances Kerry)

Copyright © 2015 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. 

 

---

 

 

SpaceX rocket explodes after launch

Miami (AFP) - An unmanned SpaceX rocket exploded less than three minutes after liftoff from Cape Canaveral, Florida on Sunday, in the first major disaster for the fast-charging company headed by Internet tycoon Elon Musk.

The accident was the third in less than a year involving US and Russian supply ships bound for the International Space Station, and raised new concerns about the flow of food and gear to the astronauts living in orbit.

Skies were sunny and clear for the 10:21 am (1421 GMT) launch of the gleaming white Falcon 9 rocket that was meant to propel the Dragon cargo ship on a routine supply mission, the seventh for SpaceX so far.

But two minutes, 19 seconds into the flight, contact was lost. Live television images from SpaceX's webcast and NASA television showed a huge puff of smoke billowing outward for several seconds, then tiny bits of the rocket falling like confetti against a backdrop of blue sky.

"The vehicle has broken up," said NASA commentator George Diller.

SpaceX's live webcast of the launch went silent as the rocket exploded.

View gallery

 

This June 28, 2015 grab from NASA TV shows the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket with the unmanned Dragon cargo …

Moments later, a SpaceX commentator said the video link from the vehicle had been lost.

"There was some kind of anomaly during first stage flight," the commentator said, noting that the rocket had ignited its nine Merlin engines and reached supersonic speed.

Later, on Twitter, Musk said the Falcon 9 "experienced a problem shortly before first stage shutdown," referring to the phase of flight before the cargo ship would have been able to separate from the first stage of the rocket and reach orbit.

The problem appeared to be linked to excessive pressure in the liquid oxygen tank, Musk wrote.

"Data suggests counterintuitive cause," said Musk, a lifelong space enthusiast who also heads Tesla Motors.

View gallery

 

This June 28, 2015 grab from NASA TV shows the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket with the unmanned Dragon cargo …

"That's all we can say with confidence right now."

More details were expected in a NASA press conference scheduled for no earlier than 12:50 pm (1650 GMT).

- Cargo concerns -

The loss came as a surprise to many who have followed Musk's California-based company through more than a dozen successful launches, even as competitor Orbital Sciences lost one of its rockets in an explosion in October, and a Russian Progress supply ship was lost after liftoff in April.

"These things do happen, but this was not the best time for this to happen," said Marco Caceres, a rocket industry analyst with the Teal Group.

View gallery

 

This June 28, 2015 grab from NASA TV shows the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket with the unmanned Dragon cargo …

"The one thing you could count on over the past few years was that the Falcon 9 was going to perform and was going to perform well," he told AFP.

"In the midst of all this other chaos in the launch industry this was like, the one stable point and now we don't have that," he told AFP.

Caceres said the accident forces SpaceX, which has a billion-dollar-plus contract with NASA for supplying the ISS but is also competing with Boeing to send astronauts there by 2017, to launch again quickly.

"The moment they launch again successfully, this accident starts to fade into history really quickly. The longer they wait to launch again, the more people start talking about, 'Maybe we were too overconfident about SpaceX,'" he said.

The Dragon cargo ship was carrying 4,000 pounds (1,800 kilograms) of gear to the space station, including a large parking space, known as an International Docking Adaptor, designed to make it easier for an array of commercial crew spacecraft to dock at the orbiting lab in the future.

View gallery

 

This March 28, 2015 still image from NASA TV shows Russian cosmonaut Gennady Padalka entering the In …

"Very sorry to see @SpaceX launch failure. Serious ramifications for Space Station resupply. Good thing it's international," wrote Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield on Twitter.

NASA administrator Charles Bolden said the US space agency was "disappointed" at the loss but that the space station has "sufficient supplies for the next several months."

A Russian Progress supply ship is scheduled to launch July 3, followed in August by a Japanese HTV flight, Bolden said.

"Orbital ATK, our other commercial cargo partner, is moving ahead with plans for its next launch later this year."

Three men are currently living at the space station. Russian cosmonaut Mikhail Kornienko and American astronaut Scott Kelly began their year-long mission in orbit back in March.

"Sadly failed. Space is hard," Kelly said on Twitter, posting a picture of his view of the Florida coast from space.

Earlier Sunday, station commander, Russian cosmonaut Gennady Padalka, 57, set a new world record when he became the person who has officially spent the longest amount of cumulative time in space -- 804 days.

His career includes one trip to the Mir Space Station and four to the ISS. 

 

Copyright © 2015 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. 

 

 

---

 

​

By William Harwood
CBS News
June 28, 2015, 11:16 AM

SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket destroyed in launch mishap

Last Updated Jun 28, 2015 12:58 PM EDT

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying a Dragon cargo ship loaded with more than 4,000 pounds of supplies and equipment bound for the International Space Station -- including a critical docking adapter needed by future U.S. crew ships -- broke apart in a shower of debris shortly after launch Sunday in a major setback for NASA and the California rocket company.

In a spectacular conflagration, the rocket, the 19th Falcon 9 launched by SpaceX since 2010, disintegrated in a sudden cloud of burning propellant followed moments later by arcing contrails of debris falling toward the Atlantic Ocean.

The last data from the spacecraft was received just under two-and-a-half minutes into flight. It was not immediately clear what triggered the failure, but unusual vapor plumes could be seen emanating from the upper section of the rocket before it went awry and SpaceX founder Elon Musk, who turned 44 Sunday, confirmed a second stage pressurization issue.

"There was an overpressure event in the upper stage liquid oxygen tank," he tweeted. "Data suggests counterintuitive cause. ... That's all we can say with confidence right now. Will have more to say following a thorough fault tree analysis."

But the incident occurred just before the first stage's nine Merlin 1D engines were to shut down two minutes and 39 seconds after liftoff.

An instant before the Falcon 9 broke apart, the vehicle looked normal as it climed out of the dense lower atmosphere.

NASA TV

An instant before the Falcon 9 broke apart, the vehicle looked normal as it climed out of the dense lower atmosphere.

NASA TV

SpaceX founder Elon Musk, celebrating his 44th birthday Sunday, initially tweeted: "Falcon 9 experienced a problem shortly before first stage shutdown. Will provide more info as soon as we review the data."

Later in the morning, he added: "There was an overpressure event in the upper stage liquid oxygen tank. Data suggests counterintuitive cause. ... That's all we can say with confidence right now. Will have more to say following a thorough fault tree analysis."

The dramatic failure came eight months after an Oct. 28 explosion that destroyed a space station cargo craft build by Orbital Sciences Corp. and two months after a Russian cargo ship spun out of control moments after reaching orbit April 28.

The Russians say they have found and fixed a problem with the Soyuz upper stage and another Progress is scheduled for launch July 3, followed by launch of a Japanese cargo ship in August.

But the back-to-back Progress and Dragon cargo failures are a major setback for NASA and its space station partners, reducing the reserves of food, clothing and other consumables needed by the lab's crew.

More important, the first of two International Docking Adapters, or IDAs, was on board as part of a major station reconfiguration to ready the lab for arrival of U.S.-built crew ships starting in 2017. A second IDA is scheduled for launch aboard a Dragon capsule in December, but the SpaceX launch schedule will almost certainly face a major revision in the wake of Sunday's failure.

A few moments later, a cloud of debris and propellant engulfed the rocket as it broke up above the Atlantic Ocean. It is not yet known what might have triggered the failure.

NASA TV

A few moments later, a cloud of debris and propellant engulfed the rocket as it broke up above the Atlantic Ocean. It is not yet known what might have triggered the failure.

NASA TV

In the near term, both of NASA's U.S. space station resupply contractors -- SpaceX and Orbital Sciences -- are out of action, leaving only the Russian Progress and Japanese HTV freighter to carry up supplies and equipment.

Space station program manager Mike Suffredini said Friday the station had enough on-board supplies to make it through October even if no other cargo ships show up. But the failure Sunday will require extensive contingency planning and it's not yet clear how that might play out.

Likewise, the failure will delay science operations. The SpaceX Dragon is the only spacecraft currently in operation that can bring cargo and research samples back to Earth, the failure Sunday will impact research aboard the station as sample returns will be suspended until the Falcon 9 returns to flight.

For SpaceX, a brash California company run by Musk, the failure was an equally dramatic setback. SpaceX that has been aggressively marketing its Falcon 9 boosters for commercial and military payloads, challenging the dominance of United Launch Alliance, a partnership between Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

The company had chalked up 18 successful Falcon 9 launches in a row since the rocket's debut in 2010 and the failure Sunday likely will force major changes in the company's flight manifest and, depending on what went wrong, it could trigger a crisis of confidence leading to higher insurance rates for commercial satellites.

SpaceX advertises Falcon 9 rockets for around $60 million each, some $50 million less than the least expensive Atlas 5 rocket currently offered by United Launch Alliance. But ULA's record with its current generation of Atlas 5 and Delta 4 boosters is 83 successful launches and no outright failures.

The Falcon 9 failure also will delay SpaceX's ambitious plans to perfect the technology needed to recover spent first stages for refurbishment and eventual reuse. Two attempts to land a Falcon 9 first stage on an off shore barge ended in failure in January and April and a third attempt was on tap Sunday.

Recovering, refurbishing and relaunching rocket stages that otherwise would be thrown away is a major element in Musk's drive to reduce the cost of spaceflight by operating a rocket company much like a commercial airline, re-flying boosters rather than building them from scratch for each flight.

But it was not to be. The rocket almost certainly will be grounded pending a detailed failure investigation.

The Falcon 9 blasted off from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at 10:21 a.m. EDT. The rocket was destroyed less than two-and-a-half minutes later after a malfunction.

NASA TV

The Falcon 9 blasted off from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at 10:21 a.m. EDT. The rocket was destroyed less than two-and-a-half minutes later after a malfunction.

NASA TV

The mission got underway on time at 10:21 a.m. EDT (GMT-5) when the Falcon 9's nine Merlin 1D engines ignited with a roar, generating 1.2 million pounds of thrust that quickly pushed the 20-story tall rocket away from launch complex 40 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.

The initial moments of the climb out of the dense lower atmosphere appeared to go smoothly as the rocket arced away to the northeast on a trajectory paralleling the East Coast of the United States.

SpaceX engineers reported "propulsion nominal" and there were no indications of anything amiss as the rocket accelerated through a near cloudless blue sky.

But in an instant, the normal-looking exhaust plume suddenly ballooned, quickly expanding in chaotic fashion as something went terribly wrong. Moments later, debris trails could be seen arcing though the sky as the initial cloud began to dissipate.

Air Force range safety officers sent self-destruct commands, but it wasn't immediately known whether the commands were received aboard the rocket before it came apart on its own.

It was the seventh flight of a Falcon 9/Dragon resupply ship under a $1.6 billion contract with NASA calling for 12 missions to the space station to deliver 44,000 pounds of supplies and equipment through 2016. Orbital Sciences Corp. holds a similar $1.9 billion contract to launch Cygnus cargo craft.

Both companies are needed to replace the lost cargo capability of the now-retired space shuttle. Orbital's Antares will be grounded throughout 2015 while the company replaces the booster's first-stage engines, relics of the Soviet Union's ill-fated moon program. Now, the Falcon 9 will be grounded pending the results of an exhaustive failure investigation.

While the station crew will face no immediate problems from the loss of the Dragon cargo craft Monday -- officials say the lab complex is fairly well stocked at present -- it is not yet clear how long the station can support a crew of six given the available cargo ships.

An International Docking Adapter lost aboard the SpaceX Dragon capsule Sunday was one of two needed by the space station for future dockings by U.S.-built crew ferry ships.

NASA TV

An International Docking Adapter lost aboard the SpaceX Dragon capsule Sunday was one of two needed by the space station for future dockings by U.S.-built crew ferry ships.

NASA TV

"If something happened to SpaceX, we'd have to figure out where we were and how quickly they could return to flight and we would react accordingly," Suffredini said in an interview earlier this year. "The crew has enough supplies, including research, to continue to work for somewhere between four and six months. So the decision we'd have to make is, how quickly can SpaceX get back up? And then what can we do with our Russian colleagues with regard to any support they might supply?

"Then we'd have to look together about what are the right steps to take, do we go ahead and let everybody go home until we're ready to resupply again, or do we step down to three crew? And I suspect that's what we'd do if we had to, we'd step down to three crew first."

But given the supplies that are constantly stockpiled on board, mission planners would have "quite a bit of time" to work through a launch problem.

"In all cases, we have plenty of time to decide what to do next, figure out what we're really dealing with and then figure out how we want to react to it," he said.

The Falcon 9 launched Sunday was an upgraded version, featuring extended propellant tanks, more efficient and lighter engines, an new triply redundant flight computer and a custom nose cone intended for large commercial satellites.

Musk has repeatedly told reporters that SpaceX would continue its quest despite any initial failures, saying before a 2013 launch that "I'm confident we will certainly make it on some subsequent launch."

 

© 2015 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.                      

 

---

 

 

Photos:

http://www.space.com/29788-spacex-rocket-landing-dragon-crs7-mission-photos.html

 

SpaceX Rocket Fails During Cargo Launch to Space Station

by Mike Wall, Space.com Senior Writer   |   June 28, 2015 10:40am ET

 

An unmanned SpaceX cargo mission crashed back to Earth today (June 28), marking the third failure of a resupply flight to the International Space Station in the past eight months.

SpaceX's robotic Dragon capsule blasted off atop the company's two-stage Falcon 9 rocket as planned today at 10:21 a.m. EDT (1421 GMT) from Florida's Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, headed for the orbiting lab. But something went wrong about two minutes into the flight, and the rocket broke apart, raining debris out of the sky.

"There was an overpressure event in the upper stage liquid oxygen tank. Data suggests counterintuitive cause," SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk said via Twitter today, which is, incidentally, his 44th birthday. "That's all we can say with confidence right now. Will have more to say following a thorough fault tree analysis." [See photos from the SpaceX cargo launch]

SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon cargo spacecraft lifted off from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on June 28, headed to the International Space Station. The rocket and capsule exploded shortly after liftoff.
Credit: NASA TV/Space.com

View full size image

SpaceX holds a $1.6 billion NASA contract to fly at least 12 unmanned supply runs to the space station. Today's liftoff kicked off mission number seven; the previous six flights had all been successful.

Dragon was carrying more than 4,000 lbs. (1,814 kilograms) of food, supplies and scientific experiments. The scientific gear included high-resolution cameras designed to observe and study meteors as they plow into Earth's atmosphere, as well as equipment that would have helped researchers better understand which microbes are present inside the space station, and how these organisms change and adapt over time.  

Today's accident follows closely on the heels of two other cargo-mission failures. Orbital ATK's Antares rocket exploded shortly after liftoff this past October, scuttling the company's third robotic cargo mission. (Orbital ATK holds a $1.9 billion deal with NASA to make eight supply flights using Antares and its Cygnus spacecraft.)

And Russia's unmanned Progress 59 vessel fell back to Earth in May without reaching the space station, apparently done in by a problem with the third stage of the Soyuz rocket that launched it to space.

Despite this recent run of setbacks, the International Space Station (ISS) remains well-provisioned into the fall, NASA officials said.

"We're good to the October timeframe if no other vehicles show up," NASA ISS program manager Mike Suffredini said during a prelaunch press conference Friday (June 26). If Dragon had made it, the $100 billion orbiting complex would have been well-stocked through the end of the year, he added.

The next Progress freighter is due to launch July 3 from Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.

SpaceX had also aimed to land the Falcon 9's first stage on an "autonomous spaceport drone ship" during today's launch, in a test of reusable-rocket technology. The company is trying to develop fully and rapidly reusable rockets, in order to slash the cost of spaceflight.

"A jumbo jet costs about the same as one of our Falcon 9 rockets, but airlines don't junk a plane after a one-way trip from LA to New York," SpaceX representatives wrote Thursday (June 25) about the company's reusable-rocket goals. "Yet when it comes to space travel, rockets fly only once — even though the rocket itself represents the majority of launch cost."

SpaceX had tried the rocket landing on the previous two Dragon launches, and nearly succeeded both times: The rocket stage hit the boat but came down too hard, toppling over and exploding on the deck.

Today's rocket failure nixed attempt number three, obviously.

 

 

Despite Rocket Explosion, New Crew Will Fly to Space Station

by Calla Cofield, Space.com Staff Writer   |   June 28, 2015 04:03pm ET

 

SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket carrying a robotic Dragon resupply capsule exploded less than three minutes after launch on June 28. The vehicle was bringing supplies to the International Space Station. Credit: NASA TV/Space.com View full size image

Following the explosion of a SpaceX resupply vehicle headed for the International Space Station, officials said there are no immediate plans to reschedule the arrival of three new crew members to the station in July.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying the company's robotic Dragon cargo vehicle exploded just over two minutes after liftoff from Florida's Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at 10:21 a.m. EDT (1421 GMT) today (June 28). Despite this being the third space station resupply vehicle to fail to reach its target in the last eight months, NASA officials said the crew is well supplied through October, with more supplies due to be delivered in the coming months.

Michaels Suffredini, NASA's program manager for the International Space Station program, said in a press conference following the rocket explosion that the current supply situation would have to be much more dire to consider bringing the current crew members home. In addition, there are no plans to cancel or reschedule the arrival of three new crew members to the station in July. [Explosion! SpaceX CRS-7 Mission Ends In Disaster (Video)]

Supply vehicles headed for the International Space Station carry a mixture of scientific experiments, equipment and hardware for the station, and supplies for the crew members who live there. Those supplies can include essentials like food, water, and oxygen, as well as items not crucial for survival.

Suffredini explained that the station is normally loaded with enough supplies to support the crew for six months; currently, the station is stocked for four months.

"If you have no means to get supplies up [to the station] at about 45 days before you get to zero, that's when we get into the process of planning the return of the crew," he said. "If the time comes and we decide we don't have the logistics to support the crew, we always have a vehicle there that can bring them home safely. And we would certainly do that, but we're not even close to that kind of conversation today based on the logistics we have on board."

SpaceX's robotic Dragon cargo vehicle is the third resupply craft that has failed to reach the orbiting station in the last eight months. In October an Orbital ATK Antares rocket exploded seconds after it pushed off the launch pad carrying a cargo capsule. In June, the Russian Progress 59 cargo vehicle successfully separated from the rocket, but fell back to Earth before making its delivery.

More supplies are scheduled to be delivered to the station as early as next weekend on board the uncrewed Russian Progress 60P cargo vehicle, which is set to launch on July 3. Suffredini said that vehicle should provide the station crew with roughly an additional month's worth of supplies. In addition, a Japanese HTV supply vehicle is scheduled to rendezvous with the station sometime in August.

Meanwhile, the Russian Soyuz spacecraft carrying three new station crew members is scheduled to leave for the orbiting laboratory on July 22. The newcomers will join the three crew members currently on board: cosmonauts Gennady Padalka and Mikhail Kornienko, and astronaut Scott Kelly. Kelly and Kornienko are participating in a one year mission aboard the station.

"Certainly if we didn't see any vehicles on the horizon today, we would be considering whether or not to fly the three [upcoming] crew that we have ready," Suffredini said. "But again that's not the position we're in."

NASA officials emphasized in the press conference that while the loss of the SpaceX cargo vehicle was a disappointment, the agency has made contingency plans for these types of setbacks.

Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's president and COO, said in the press conference that it is not yet clear what caused the explosion. Elon Musk, the company's founder, tweeted shortly after the explosion that there was an "overpressure event in the upper stage liquid oxygen tank," but Shotwell could not offer any more information about that event or whether it played a part in the rocket explosion. She did note that the rocket's first stage separation appears to have proceeded nominally.

This is SpaceX's seventh resupply mission to the International Space Station; the previous six missions have all been successful. The company holds a $1.6 billion contract with NASA to fly at least 12 unmanned cargo missions to the orbiting outpost. 

 

 

Copyright © 2015 TechMediaNetwork.com All rights reserved. 

 

---

 

 

 

UPDATED | SpaceX Falcon 9 Fails During ISS Cargo Launch

by Jeff Foust — June 28, 2015

Debris from a SpaceX Falcon 9 during a June 28 launch on a mission to the ISS. Credit: SpaceX webcast screen capture.

Updated 2:30 p.m. EDT.

WASHINGTON — A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket suffered a failure more than two minutes after liftoff June 28 on a mission to deliver cargo to the International Space Station, an accident that may have repercussions on both space station operations and the debate about funding for NASA's commercial crew program.

The Falcon 9 lifted off on schedule at 10:21 a.m. EDT Sunday after a problem-free countdown, and in good weather conditions. The launch appeared to be going well until a little more than two minutes after liftoff, when the first stage plume became irregular and, seconds later, the rocket appeared to disintegrate.

"The first stage flight was successful until 139 seconds into that flight. We experienced an anomaly that led to the failure of the mission," SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell said at a NASA press conference nearly three hours after the failure.

View post on imgur.com

Video of the launch showed the anomaly started about 2 minutes and 19 seconds after launch, with a cloud forming near the top of the vehicle. It was not initially clear if that was the cause of the failure, or an effect of another problem with the rocket. "Falcon 9 experienced a problem shortly before first stage shutdown," SpaceX Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted shortly after the failure. "Will provide more info as soon as we review the data."

Falcon 9 experienced a problem shortly before first stage shutdown. Will provide more info as soon as we review the data.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 28, 2015

Musk later tweeted that the problem was an "overpressurization event" of the liquid oxygen tank in the rocket's second stage. "Data suggests counterintuitive cause," he said, without elaborating.

There was an overpressure event in the upper stage liquid oxygen tank. Data suggests counterintuitive cause. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 28, 2015

"We do not expect this to have been a first stage issue," Shotwell said at the briefing. "We saw some pressurization indications in the second stage, which we'll be tracking down and following up on there." She said she didn't have additional data about the second stage issue, and declined to speculate on the cause of the failure.

The mission was considered a commercial launch, and licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of Commercial Space Transportation. Pam Underwood of the FAA said at the briefing that SpaceX would lead what is officially termed a "mishap" investigation, with oversight of the FAA.

Neither Shotwell nor Underwood said how long the investigation would last, or its effect on SpaceX's launch schedule. "It certainly isn't going to be a year," Shotwell said of the length of the investigation. "I imagine a number of months or so."

NASA officials expressed their disappointment in the failure, but said they continued to support SpaceX and emphasized that the failure would not have an immediate effect on ISS operations.

"We are disappointed in the loss of the latest SpaceX cargo resupply mission to the International Space Station," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a statement issued two hours after the launch failure. "However, the astronauts are safe aboard the station and have sufficient supplies for the next several months."

"The space station crew is fine on orbit," William Gerstenmaier, NASA associate administrator for human exploration and operations, said at the June 28 briefing. There are enough supplies on the station now to support the ISS crew through October, with a Progress cargo spacecraft slated for launch July 3 and a Japanese H-2 Transfer Vehicle cargo mission planned for August.

The failure is the first in 19 launches for the Falcon 9, which first launched five years ago. It is the first failure of a SpaceX launch vehicle since the third launch of its initial Falcon 1 small launch vehicle in August 2008.

The launch was the seventh in a series of cargo missions to the ISS under a SpaceX contract with NASA. The Dragon was carrying 1,950 kilograms of cargo for the station, including a docking adapter to allow future commercial crew vehicles to dock with the station. Also on board were supplies for the crew and a series of experiments.

The failure is the third involving an ISS cargo mission in eight months. An Orbital Sciences Corp. (now Orbital ATK) Antares rocket failed seconds after liftoff in Oct. 28 from Wallops Island, Virginia, destroying a Cygnus cargo spacecraft. A Progress spacecraft launched April 28 was placed in the wrong orbit by its Soyuz launch vehicle and reentered in May without docking at the ISS.

"We expected through the commercial cargo program that we would lose some vehicles," said Gerstenmaier. "I didn't think we'd lose them all in a one-year timeframe, but we have."

The failure also comes as both NASA reviews proposals from several companies for follow-on ISS cargo delivery contracts, and seeks full funding for its commercial crew program for fiscal year 2016. Appropriations bills in the House and Senate both fall short of the agency's request of $1.243 billion for the program, with the House bill providing $1 billion and the Senate bill $900 million. The Senate bill in particular was critical of what it perceived as delays in the development of crewed vehicles.

Eric Stallmer, president of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation, remained optimistic about both SpaceX and overall commercialization efforts. "I think we just move forward," he said in a June 28 interview. "I think SpaceX will make adjustments and continue to fly."

He acknowledged that the failure will heighten skepticism about NASA's commercial crew efforts on Capitol Hill. "I know there will be debate, and questions raised, but I do believe you have to stay the course," he said. "We need to figure out what went wrong and continue to move foward and shoot for that 2017 date" when NASA anticipates those vehicles entering service, he said.

Bolden was also optimistic. "SpaceX has demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in its first six cargo resupply missions to the station, and we know they can replicate that success," he said in his statement. "Today's launch attempt will not deter us from our ambitious human spaceflight program."

Shortly after T+2 minutes, the NASA announcer says, "Everything coming back shows the vehicle on course, on track." The Falcon 9 then appears to explode. Credit: NASA TV

 

 © 2015 SpaceNews, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

---

 

 

 

U.S. Reliance on Russia for ISS Ops Grows With Falcon 9 Loss

Jun 28, 2015 

Mark Carreau and Frank Morring, Jr. | 

Aerospace Daily & Defense Report

 

 

This much was clear as investigators began to probe the loss of the SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon resupply mission loss: The U.S. is at least temporarily without a means of launching astronauts and cargo to the six-person International Space Station, placing a growing burden on Russia to do what it can to keep the outpost minimally equipped and staffed.

So far, tensions between Washington and Moscow over Russia's intrusion into Ukraine have not seeped into the deceptively tenuous U.S.-led day-to-day operations of the 15-nation station program.

However, Russia, too, is recovering from the failed April 28 launch of its Progress M-27M/59 ISS cargo mission. Russia's federal space agency, Roscosmos, hopes to turn the loss around on July 3 with the launching of the Progress M-28M/60 cargo mission, but is slated to use the same Soyuz 2/1a launch vehicle that contributed to an out of control third-stage separation and subsequent uncontrolled re-entry with the loss of more than three tons of fuel, food, clothing, spare parts and other supplies.

That compounded the re-supply difficulties triggered by the Oct. 28 launch explosion of Orbital ATK's third Antares/Cygnus mission as it lifted off from Wallops Island, Va., with 4,800 pounds of supplies and science experiments, some of which were re-gathered and aboard the Falcon9/Dragon.

"We are disappointed in the loss of the latest SpaceX cargo resupply mission to the International Space Station," Administrator Charles Bolden stated Sunday. "However, the astronauts are safe aboard the station and have sufficient supplies for the next several months. We will work closely with SpaceX to understand what happened, fix the problem and return to flight. The commercial cargo program was designed to accommodate loss of cargo vehicles. "A Progress vehicle is ready to launch July 3, followed in August by a Japanese HTV flight. Orbital ATK, our other commercial cargo partner, is moving ahead with plans for its next launch later this year. " 

Down to two Russian and one American crew member as a consequence of the Progress M-27M loss, the ISS is provisioned through October, less than the normal six-month supply cushion that NASA's Mike Suffredini, the ISS program manager, and his Mission Management Team prefer. Their expectation was that the lost Dragon CRS-7 mission, one of eight U. S. Russian and Japanese cargo flights planned for the remainder of this year, would restore the six-month cushion by the start of 2016.

"We're getting close to six months," Suffredini told a June 26 pre-launch news briefing. "It's not a hard requirement. We are trying to get there while still carrying the spare parts we need and of course all the research we need. But I think by the end of the year, we will be closer to where we would like to be, which is closer to about five to six months. We will try to stay there and gradually get ourselves all the way back up to six months."

Also lost aboard the Dragon CRS-7 was the first of two NASA/Boeing-developed International Docking Adaptors that were to fly to the station in 2015. NASA intended to install the IDA-1 with spacewalks late this summer to establish the first ISS docking port for its Commercial Crew Program Boeing CST-100 and SpaceX crewed Dragon vehicles by the end of 2015.

While NASA did not provide a cost estimate for the IDA-1, it is part of a $100 million development effort to equip the station with two docking ports for Boeing and SpaceX commercial crew vehicles.

The installation of IDA-1 on an external station docking port once used by NASA's retired space shuttle fleet was initially planned for late July. The installation was delayed by the Progress M-27M launch failure. Preparations to restore the ISS to six crew, including a second NASA astronaut for the spacewalk, were put on hold until July 22 so that the Russians could demonstrate a recovery from the failed launch before they placed U.S. Japanese and Russian astronauts on a normally reliable FG version of the Soyuz rocket.

Delivery of the second IDA was tentatively planned for the ninth Falcon 9/Dragon CRS mission planned for a Dec. 9 liftoff.

The loss of the first IDA compounds already mounting problems for NASA's Commercial Crew Program, which is seeking $1.24 billion in its 2016 budget to keep efforts in place to resume U.S. launchings of astronauts to the station by the end of 2017. House and Senate appropriators are providing hundreds of millions of dollars below the figure that NASA administrator Charles Bolden has warned is mandatory if the commercial crew initiative is to meet its target.

NASA's station-resupply strategy began to unravel on Oct. 28, as Orbital ATK's (then Orbital Sciences) third NASA contracted Antares/Cygnus re-supply mission exploded seconds after liftoff from Wallops Island, Va.,

An investigation into the cause of the mishap continues, though participants point to a failure of a turbopump in a Russian supplied first stage rocket engine.

Currently, Orbital ATK is prepping for the launching of its next ISS cargo mission in mid-November, using a United Launch Alliance Atlas V launch vehicle as a substitute for the Antares. Orbital intends to resume launchings at Wallops with a re-engined Antares next year.

The European Space Agency's reliable and capable ISS Automated Transfer Vehicle resupply missions came to an end in February after five flights. ESA has moved from ISS re-supply activities to partner with NASA for the development of a service module for the unpiloted Space Launch System/Orion Exploration Mission test flight planned for 2018.

Meanwhile, the space agency is in the process of re-competing its U. S. ISS commercial resupply needs in order to support an extension of station operations from 2020 to 2024.

SpaceX and Orbital led the way with contracts awarded in late 2008, $1.6 billion to SpaceX for at least 12 missions, $1.9 billion to Orbital ATK for at least eight flights.

 

Copyright © 2015, Penton.  All rights reserved.

 

---