https://bridenstine.house.gov/space/?postid=756
Sent from my iPad
Monday, July 31, 2017
Saturday, July 29, 2017
We must control Space !
How can you take our accomplishments in space & just act like oh that is history?
When anyone with half a brain knows the USA must be preeminent in space to survive!
Regardless of what Trump & Pence say, we are not expanding or even maintaining our 2011 capabilities!!!!
You better take action!!
Sent from my iPad
Friday, July 28, 2017
Lack of capabilities!
Look at all we have accomplished in Space, from Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Shuttle ---- now we have to use Russia to get to ISS! Totally nonsensical, all due to an excessive number of mentally deficient liberals in the US government! Look at healthcare & North Korea ---- wake up & get libs out including RINO's BEFORE too late.!!
Also, shuttle replacement , Commercial crew, an inferior approach ( except Dreamchaser)) is underfunded!!
Sent from my iPad
USA space capability ( or lack of) !
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Fwd: Can Trump Really Make America Great Again?
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Charles Payne" <CharlesPayne@Investorplace.com>
Date: July 25, 2017 at 8:03:08 AM CDT
To: Bobby <bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com>
Subject: Can Trump Really Make America Great Again?
Reply-To: CharlesPayne@Investorplace.com
A New American Revolution is Brewing
Fellow American,Can President Trump deliver on his promise to Make America Great Again?
That's the question everyone is asking right now.
My name is Charles Payne, and you may know me from my show on Fox Business News or my regular appearances on Fox News.
But I'm writing today to share what I can't tell you on TV.
So here's the truth about President Trump's ambitious plans…
We are on the cusp of a new era that is going to help America once again achieve greatness and return to her place as the strongest and most powerful economy in the world.
Don't be distracted by the healthcare drama consuming Washington and the liberal media—there is something much more important happening that most people are overlooking…
President Trump has already acted quickly to slash regulations that were crushing businesses, killing jobs and holding back spending.
His America-first focus has unleashed a new optimism that has sent the markets to new highs and has consumer confidence soaring.
And now is the perfect time to get on board with the companies that will profit from the President's plans to rebuild America.
I've just released a brand-new report with all the details, and I'm making it available free for the next 24 hours. I urge you to click here now to read it immediately.
Read my special free report, Making America Great Again: 3 Companies Rebuilding America, to discover the companies leading the charge:
- Massive government and corporate spending will mean new projects at factories, businesses, schools, and more. And this all-star company provides a mission-critical service that will be at the center of it all. Get its name and my full analysis here.
- Increased goods being made in America, supplies needed for infrastructure projects and increased coal production all have one thing in common—they all need transportation to get from point A to B. This company will be one of the prime beneficiaries. Wall Street is taking notice too, and the stock is already headed higher on a series of upgrades.
- Private sector companies, utilities, government and even homeowners will all be turning to this company to supply critical tools necessary for the projects ahead. I'm looking for this juggernaut to deliver a huge gains in the next two years. Get on board before the "Trump Train" sends it out of reach!
There aren't many sure things in life but this is one of them: We are a nation of builders and innovators and there is no stopping the American drive when it's unleashed.
With President Trump getting government the heck out of the way, stirring optimism and focusing on America first, we can make America great again.
And the three companies I detail in this brand new report are leading the charge. All three are at the top of my buy list and you can get my full analysis on each absolutely free for the next 24 hours.
Yours for Smarter Investing,
Charles Payne
InvestorPlace Media, LLC.
9201 Corporate Blvd, Suite 200
Rockville, MD 20850This message was sent by Patriot Alerts.
This message was intended for: bobbygmartin1938@gmail.com
You were added to the system June 21, 2016.
For more information click here. Update your preferences
Unsubscribe | Unsubscribe via email
Monday, July 24, 2017
Sunday, July 23, 2017
X37C
Hey, Trump, ask Boeing CEO about benefits of X37C. Might talk to Jim Hillhouse & George Abbey of Baker Institute.
Sent from my iPad
Well, after talking to Capitol Hill staffers, they too are suffering the same head issues I am. At least I'm in good company.
Rather than talk about what Congress will or will not pay for, let's review what Congress has done since 2010 on space funding.
Congress has, on its own and despite both opposition from the Administration and aggressive delaying tactics on the SLS and Orion programs from NASA, appropriated those amounts needed to keep both Orion and SLS on track. And just as it's done since 2010, Congress is going to do what it wants on HSF, which is fund Orion and SLS fully.
What Congress sees is not a justification for Commercial Crew. Far from it. Congressional staffers are well aware of the true progress of that program and no, none of those players are getting us to ISS anytime soon. That's largely NASA's fault since Congress has informed it that the CCP program needed to down-selected years ago to better focus limited resources for faster progress. But NASA's leadership didn't do that for political reasons. Loose Boeing and CCP looses luster and respectability. Loose Sierra Nevada and we working on three capsule programs. And if you want to make engineers working in GN&C or ELSS laugh, tell them that one of the CCP companies will be flying crews by 2016. Guffaws galore.
And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/x-37b-expanded-capabilities-iss-missions/
What Congress does see is that if we had not gone through the nonsense of 2010, we would be much closer to our own capability to launch crews to ISS than we are today. Instead, Neil Armstrong was right–the Administration changed our nation's HSF course in secret, without consultation, and mucked things up.
When it comes to the Moon, Congress is funding $3.5B annually on the DDTE for Orion and SLS. Anything else will have to wait for a new Administration as there is zero trust right now in Congress of anything the White House or NASA HQ are selling about human spaceflight.
Sent from my iPad
Saturday, July 22, 2017
EO operations
Friday, July 21, 2017
Thursday, July 20, 2017
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Making America Great in space operations!
Monday, July 17, 2017
Sunday, July 16, 2017
We need this capability to----
Speaking at a technology summit hosted by Defense One, Bhavya Lal, with the Institute for Defense Analysis at the Science and Technology Policy Institute, said focusing on the problems of the future will help the U.S. maintain its technological lead in space.
"One of the things we need to worry about is what are going to be the emerging technologies a decade from now so we can stay ahead of the Russia's and China's?" she said. "One potential technology that both the government and the private sector are starting to look at is on-orbit manufacturing, assembly, and servicing. I think it's an area we need to think about more, we need to bring the private sector in more, the government needs to think differently about how you construct and use an on-orbit platform in the case of war."
Friday, July 14, 2017
X37C
Abbey on space capabilities
Money spent on human exploration should be used to develop capabilities needed for a meaningful program. Research into long space flights can be done at the International Space Station, which should therefore be vigorously supported. Abundant launch vehicles are already on the commercial market, and yet a new and very expensive launch vehicle, with undefined payload and mission, is being developed. Three spacecraft are being developed to carry astronauts to space. Does the nation need three space capsules with limited capabilities? The capability that is lacking is the one that saved Hubble and built the largest structure ever assembled and flown in space. A redesigned X-37 that can carry astronauts could provide such a capability.
Reducing the cost of space flight would be a big help. Jeff Bezos of Blue Origin and Elon Musk of SpaceX are pursuing the technology for reusable rockets. United Launch Alliance is pursuing reusable first-stage engines for its next-generation Vulcan rocket. It expects the recovery of the engines alone to reduce the propulsion cost of the booster by up to 90 percent. A fly-back booster was considered during early design studies for the space shuttle, and could be achieved today. NASA should lead the way to provide such a capability and establish U.S. leadership in launch technology.
America needs a space policy that has a vision that can build on past achievements and keep moving forward. A big part of that is construction, maintenance and servicing in low-Earth orbit. Another is international cooperation. And we should realign our goals with those of other major space-faring nations and look back to the Moon, so we again become the leaders in space. After all, we've been there before. A lunar exploration program would provide the foundation for manned missions beyond the Moon. Our eyes must look to the skies with purpose toward that limitless frontier.
George Abbey is senior fellow in space policy at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. He is the former director of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
Sent from my iPad
Thursday, July 13, 2017
X37C
Well, after talking to Capitol Hill staffers, they too are suffering the same head issues I am. At least I'm in good company.
Rather than talk about what Congress will or will not pay for, let's review what Congress has done since 2010 on space funding.
Congress has, on its own and despite both opposition from the Administration and aggressive delaying tactics on the SLS and Orion programs from NASA, appropriated those amounts needed to keep both Orion and SLS on track. And just as it's done since 2010, Congress is going to do what it wants on HSF, which is fund Orion and SLS fully.
What Congress sees is not a justification for Commercial Crew. Far from it. Congressional staffers are well aware of the true progress of that program and no, none of those players are getting us to ISS anytime soon. That's largely NASA's fault since Congress has informed it that the CCP program needed to down-selected years ago to better focus limited resources for faster progress. But NASA's leadership didn't do that for political reasons. Loose Boeing and CCP looses luster and respectability. Loose Sierra Nevada and we working on three capsule programs. And if you want to make engineers working in GN&C or ELSS laugh, tell them that one of the CCP companies will be flying crews by 2016. Guffaws galore.
And those in Congress specializing in space are well aware that, had getting independent access to ISS for our nation really been Job #1 for NASA's leadership, then the Administration would have approved Boeing's proposal for the X-37B follow-on, the 5 crew X-37C. We are talking about a dependable spacecraft that can sit in orbit for over a year and NASA said no to making it a crewed vehicle. Why?
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/x-37b-expanded-capabilities-iss-missions/
What Congress does see is that if we had not gone through the nonsense of 2010, we would be much closer to our own capability to launch crews to ISS than we are today. Instead, Neil Armstrong was right–the Administration changed our nation's HSF course in secret, without consultation, and mucked things up.
When it comes to the Moon, Congress is funding $3.5B annually on the DDTE for Orion and SLS. Anything else will have to wait for a new Administration as there is zero trust right now in Congress of anything the White House or NASA HQ are selling about human spaceflight.
Sent from my iPad
Saturday, July 8, 2017
Thursday, July 6, 2017
Wednesday, July 5, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)